ABSTRACT
Objective To assess the association of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and low-level high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) with the invasion of prostate cancer (PCa) in the patients after radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods We collected and analyzed the data of 232 PCa patients treated with RP for prospective multicenter clinical study.The MetS was assessed according to NCEP-ATP Ⅲ.Patients were divided into MetS group and non-MetS group.Locally advanced PCa was defined as a pT-stage≥3.ISUP Gleason grading system (GS) were used for pathological grading.Logistic regression analyses assessed the association of MetS and its components with pathological data. Results MetS was an independent risk factor for GS≥8 after RP.Low HDL-C level was associated with locally advanced PCa.The risks of adverse pathological features increased with the number of MetS components. Conclusion Low HDL-C level and 4 or more MetS components are associated with higher risk of adverse pathological features of PCa.
ABSTRACT
Objective To discuss the safety and efficacy of inserting ureterovesical reimplantation by means of laparoscopy associated with six-stitch suture.Methods There was an retrospective analysis on operation videos and clinical data for 16 participants of inserting ureterovesical reimplantation by means of laparoscopy associated with six-stitch suture with the period from March in 2012 to September in 2015. And these were statistically analyzed including the operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative drainage volume, removal time of drainage tube, admission time after operation and the incidence of postoperative complications of vesicoureteric reflux and stenosis.Results The operations of 16 participants were completed successfully without converting to open surgery. The operation time was 60 ~ 125 min (Mean time: 85 min); intraoperative bleeding volume was 20 ~ 50 ml (Mean volume: 32 ml); postoperative drainage volume was 60 ~ 400 ml (Mean volume: 106 ml); removal time of drainage tube was 3 ~ 6 d (Mean time: 4.2 d) and admission time after operation was 7 ~ 10 d (Mean time: 8.5 d). There was the follow-up with 6 ~ 18 months (Mean time: 12 months) for participants. No anastomotic stenosis was present. In addition, one participant was suffered from mild vesicoureteric relfux. And there was no aggravation during 18 months.Conclusions The inserting ureterovesical reimplantation by means of laparoscopy associated with six-stitch suture was safe and effective. It was found that the operation time was significantly shortened and the incidence of postoperative complications of vesicoureteric relfux and anastomotic stenosis was not increased. By contrast, the six-stitch suture could reduce the incidence of anastomotic stenosis.
ABSTRACT
Objective To discuss the safety and effectiveness of the drainage of perinephric abscess with retroperitoneal laparoscopy.Methods The clinical data of 12 cases undergoing the drainage of perinephric abscess with retroperitoneal laparoscopy were analyzed retrospectively.There were 3 males and 9 females,with a mean age of 47 years.All the 12 cases presented with lumbar pain and fever,7 cases had chill,5 cases had irritative symptom of bladder,and 4 cases had nausea and vomiting.The average course was 9 d,and the average diameter was 6.4 cm.Four cases were in the left side,and 8 in the right side.The main complications included type-2 diabetes (5 cases),type-1 diabetes (1 case),kidney stones (2 cases) and systemic lupus erythematosus (1 case).All the 12 cases were treated with antibiotics.The indexes were recorded,including operative time,intraoperative blood loss,purulent fluid volume,postoperative indwelling time of the drainage tube,postoperative time of body temperature returned to normal,postoperative hospital stay,and complication rate.Results All the 12 operations were successful without peritoneal damage,kidney damage or other complications.The mean operative time was 56 (48-95) min,the mean intraoperative blood loss was 127 (60-150) ml,the mean intraoperative purulent fluid volume drawed out was 128 (120-230) ml,the mean postoperative indwelling time of the drainage tube was 9 (6-12) d,the mean postoperative time of body temperature returned to normal was 3 (2-4) d,and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 10 (7-12) d.All the patients were followed up for an average of 6.5 (6-12) months,no recurrence occured.Conclusions The drainage of perinephric abscess with retroperitoneal laparoscopy has the advantages of definite effectiveness,complete drainage,little injury and rapid recovery.The drainage of perinephric abscess with retroperitoneal laparoscopy by skilled urologists is safe.
ABSTRACT
ObjectiveTo study the anatomical characteristics of the renal pedicle and its clinical application during retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy.MethodsThe imaging, surgical video and clinical data of 278 cases undergoing retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy between July 2007 and September 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. The renal pedicle was found located at the psoas and the medial arcuate ligament of the diaphragm for anatomic landmark before the gap of the psoas. A statistical analysis of the mean operative time, the mean time to look for the renal pedicle, the mean intraoperative estimated blood loss, the mean time to ambulation, the mean time to resuming oral intake, the mean postoperative hospital stay day and the rate of complications was performed.ResultsAll the operations were performed successfully, with no conversion to open and blood transfusion. The mean time to find the renal pedicle was (3.5 ± 1.3 ) min, the mean operative time was (95.6 ±23.8) min, the mean estimated blood loss was (72.4 ±27.5) ml, the mean time to resuming oral intake was (2.1 ±0.7) d, the mean time to ambulation was (1.8 ±0.9) d, the mean postoperative hospital stay was (8.5 ± 2.7 ) d.ConclusionsDuring retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy, the best anatomical space to look for the renal pedicle is the space before the psoas muscle. The exact location of the renal pedicle is under the diaphragm medial arcuate ligament about 2 - 4 cm, in the gap of the psoas muscle and the vena cava (abdominal aorta). Following this procedure could reduce the time to look for the renal pedicle, thus reducing operative time.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the appropriate incision for intact specimen extraction during retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy. Methods One hundred and nineteen patients in need of retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy were randomized into two groups. One group of 60 patients received intact specimen extraction through a muscle-splitting abdominal incision. The second group of 59 patients received intact specimen extraction through a muscle-cutting lumbar incision. All procedures were performed by the same team of surgeons, and the intact specimens were extracted by the same surgeon. Standard operative features were measured and recorded (operative time, the time of specimen extraction, incision length, specimen weight, the time to get out of bed, the recovery time of gastrointestinal function, postoperative hospital stay, analgesia requirement, and complication rate). Results The two groups were matched in regard to patient age, body mass index, the maximum diameter of the kidney, and the stage of TNM (each P>0.05). There were significant differences between the abdominal incision group and lumbar incision group in terms of operative time (99±14 min vs 115±12 min; P=0.000), incision length (4.9±0.3 cm vs 5.3±0.4 cm; P=0.000), the time of specimen extraction (14±2 min vs 24±6 min; P=0.000), analgesia requirement (35±27 mg vs 52±29 mg; P=0.002), the time to get out of bed (20±2 h vs 21±4 h; P=0.016). The differences were not significant between the 2 groups in terms of the recovery time of gastrointestinal function (21±3 h vs 20±4 h; P=0.457), hospital stay (6±1 d vs 6±1 d; P=0.476), and specimen weight (469±181 g vs 459±169 g; P=0.776). There was no complication of incision in the 2 groups at 12 months′ follow-up (rang, 6 to 18 months). Conclusion A muscle-splitting abdominal incision for intact specimen extraction is more appropriate than a lumbar incision during retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy, with small incision, little injury, short operative time, quick recovery, and less pain.